Account
Language
Time Zone
COEF
Half Time/Full Time Predictions Yesterday
Review yesterday's Half Time/Full Time football predictions on Betiball and compare the original HT/FT forecast with the actual result at both the interval and full-time. Each completed fixture provides a historical view of the predicted match path, the Half Time score, the Final Score and whether the selected 1/1, X/1, X/X, 2/2 or other HT/FT combination was correct.
Use the completed matches below to review yesterday's HT/FT results, or compare yesterday's Half Time predictions, yesterday's 1X2 results, today's Half Time/Full Time predictions, tomorrow's HT/FT predictions and all Half Time/Full Time predictions.
HT
FT
2026-10-23
Ipswich Town vs Nottingham Forest - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
Alaves vs Malaga - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
VfB Stuttgart vs Borussia Monchengladbach - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
Torino vs Monza - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
Stade Brestois vs Nice - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
Hoang Anh Gia Lai vs Song Lam Nghe An - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
Viettel FC vs TDTT Bac Ninh - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
Brisbane Roar vs Perth Glory - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
Bolton Wanderers vs Middlesbrough - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
Ho Chi Minh City B (W) vs TNG Thai Nguyen (W) - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
Vitoria Guimaraes vs Maritimo - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
Go Ahead Eagles vs SC Telstar - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
Khatoco Khanh Hoa vs Than Quang Ninh - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
Becamex TP Ho Chi Minh vs Thai Nguyen - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
Quy Nhon United vs Lam Dong - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
Atletico Nacional Medellin vs Deportivo Pasto - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
Boyaca Chico vs Atletico Bucaramanga - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
Elfsborg vs Malmo FF - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
Vasteras SK FK vs Halmstads - Prediction & Odds
2026-10-23
Alanyaspor vs Kocaelispor - Prediction & Odds
Yesterday's Half Time/Full Time Prediction Results
This page reviews completed HT/FT forecasts rather than predicting future fixtures. Every settled match should retain the original Half Time/Full Time selection alongside the actual interval score, final score and resulting match path.
HT/FT combines two separate result checkpoints. The first symbol describes the Half Time result and the second describes the Full Time result.
| HT/FT | Half Time | Full Time |
|---|---|---|
| 1/1 | Home | Home |
| 1/X | Home | Draw |
| 1/2 | Home | Away |
| X/1 | Draw | Home |
| X/X | Draw | Draw |
| X/2 | Draw | Away |
| 2/1 | Away | Home |
| 2/X | Away | Draw |
| 2/2 | Away | Away |
How Yesterday's HT/FT Result Is Determined
A historical HT/FT result requires two pieces of information: which team, if either, was leading when the first half ended and which team, if either, was ahead when the relevant full match period finished.
The two results are then joined into one match-path code.
| HT Score | FT Score | HT/FT Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1-0 | 2-0 | 1/1 |
| 1-0 | 1-1 | 1/X |
| 1-0 | 1-2 | 1/2 |
| 0-0 | 2-0 | X/1 |
| 0-0 | 1-1 | X/X |
| 1-1 | 1-2 | X/2 |
| 0-1 | 2-1 | 2/1 |
| 0-1 | 1-1 | 2/X |
| 0-1 | 0-2 | 2/2 |
Predicted Match Path vs Actual Match Path
The central historical comparison should be between the HT/FT outcome selected before kick-off and the combination produced by the actual match.
| Field | Historical Meaning |
|---|---|
| Predicted HT/FT | Highest-ranked match path before kick-off |
| Prediction Probability | Original estimated probability of that combination |
| HT Score | Actual score when the opening period ended |
| HT Result | Actual 1, X or 2 at Half Time |
| FT Score | Actual final score for the defined match period |
| FT Result | Actual 1, X or 2 at Full Time |
| Actual HT/FT | The resulting two-stage match path |
| Prediction Result | Correct or Incorrect |
A Correct HT/FT Prediction Requires Both Stages to Match
Getting only the Half Time result or only the Full Time result right is not enough for a correct Half Time/Full Time prediction. Both checkpoints must match the selected combination.
Example
If the model predicts X/1 and the match is 0-0 at half-time before finishing 2-0, both stages match and the HT/FT selection is correct.
If the same match is 1-0 at half-time and finishes 2-0, the final Home result was correct but the actual HT/FT combination is 1/1 rather than X/1.
Partial Accuracy Should Be Separated from Exact HT/FT Accuracy
Although an HT/FT selection requires both stages for settlement, historical analysis can still show whether the model correctly identified one of the two checkpoints.
| Predicted | Actual | HT Correct? | FT Correct? | Exact HT/FT? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| X/1 | X/1 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| X/1 | 1/1 | No | Yes | No |
| X/1 | X/X | Yes | No | No |
| X/1 | 2/2 | No | No | No |
This distinction can make model diagnostics more useful without changing how the actual HT/FT prediction is settled.
Why All Nine Probabilities Are More Useful Than One Pick
HT/FT has nine possible outcomes, so the probability distribution contains substantially more information than a single prediction label.
A leading X/1 selection at 29% has a very different meaning from a 1/1 selection carrying 54%.
Highly concentrated distribution
One or two match paths account for a large share of total probability.
Diffuse distribution
Several combinations carry similar probabilities, signalling greater uncertainty about how the result will develop.
Historical results should therefore preserve at least the leading probability and ideally the complete nine-outcome distribution.
The Probability of the Actual HT/FT Result Adds Important Context
A prediction can be incorrect while the actual match path still carried a meaningful probability before kick-off.
| Prediction | Actual Result | Original Actual-Result Probability |
|---|---|---|
| 1/1 at 38% | X/1 | 27% |
| X/X at 31% | X/2 | 22% |
| 2/2 at 44% | 1/2 | 14% |
These are presentation examples rather than Betiball match data.
1/1 and 2/2 Measure Lead Retention
The 1/1 and 2/2 combinations represent matches in which the team leading at the interval remains the winner at Full Time.
1/1
The home side establishes a first-half advantage and retains the winning result.
2/2
The away side reaches the interval ahead and remains in front at Full Time.
Historical conversion rate
Betiball can analyse how often teams leading at the break later win, providing a useful supporting metric for reviewing these two match paths.
X/1 and X/2 Capture Second-Half Separation
These combinations describe matches that remain level through the opening period but are decided after the break.
X/1
The teams are level at Half Time before the home side wins.
X/2
The opening period finishes level before the away side establishes a winning margin.
Historical analysis can compare first-half Draw forecasts with later Home or Away win probabilities to understand how well the model identifies teams expected to create separation after the interval.
X/X Represents a Draw at Both Checkpoints
X/X does not require the exact same score at Half Time and Full Time. It requires only that the teams are level at both moments.
| HT | FT | HT/FT |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | 0-0 | X/X |
| 0-0 | 1-1 | X/X |
| 1-1 | 1-1 | X/X |
| 1-1 | 2-2 | X/X |
1/2 and 2/1 Represent Complete Reversals
These are match paths where the team trailing at Half Time goes on to win the match.
1/2
The home team leads at the interval before the away side completes a full comeback.
2/1
The visiting team leads at Half Time before the home side overturns the deficit.
Because complete reversals involve multiple changes in score state, they often occupy a smaller share of the pre-match probability distribution than more straightforward paths.
1/X and 2/X Represent Leads That Disappear
A Half Time lead does not always become a victory.
1/X
The home side leads at the break but the match finishes level.
2/X
The away side leads at Half Time but the final result is a Draw.
Historical lead-retention and equaliser rates can help explain how often these pathways occur.
Half-Time Score Provides More Detail Than the HT Symbol Alone
Two fixtures can both have an HT result of 1 while describing very different first halves.
A 1-0 interval and a 3-1 interval both translate to HT Home, but the number of goals and size of the lead can affect the second-half match state significantly.
| HT Score | HT Result | Lead Margin |
|---|---|---|
| 1-0 | 1 | Home +1 |
| 2-0 | 1 | Home +2 |
| 0-1 | 2 | Away +1 |
| 0-2 | 2 | Away +2 |
Lead Size Can Change the Second-Half Path
A one-goal Half Time lead is more vulnerable to a single equaliser than a two-goal advantage.
Historical HT/FT analysis can therefore benefit from storing both the categorical HT result and the exact interval score.
One-goal HT lead
The trailing side needs one goal to restore a level match.
Two-goal HT lead
The trailing team must score at least twice without conceding again merely to reach a Draw.
This difference can help explain why apparently similar 1/1 or 2/2 predictions may carry different probabilities.
Expected First-Half and Second-Half Goals Can Be Audited Separately
If Betiball stores period-specific expected-goal estimates, yesterday's results provide a useful dataset for comparing first-half and second-half scoring expectations with what actually occurred.
Expected first-half goals
This can help explain the probability of reaching the break with a Home, Draw or Away result.
Expected second-half goals
This can provide context for the likelihood of the match result changing after the interval.
Actual period goals
The realised first-half and second-half totals should be recorded separately from the original estimates.
Second-Half Result Change Is a Useful Historical Metric
HT/FT naturally allows Betiball to measure how often the result category changes after the interval.
| HT/FT Group | Result Behaviour |
|---|---|
| 1/1 | Home lead retained |
| 2/2 | Away lead retained |
| X/X | Draw retained |
| X/1 or X/2 | Draw converted into a win |
| 1/X or 2/X | Lead converted into a draw |
| 1/2 or 2/1 | Complete reversal |
Historical Accuracy Should Be Broken Down by Match Path
A single HT/FT accuracy percentage can hide substantial differences across the nine outcome types.
| Outcome | Recommended Metrics |
|---|---|
| 1/1 | Picks, correct, accuracy and average probability |
| X/1 | Picks, correct, accuracy and average probability |
| X/X | Picks, correct, accuracy and average probability |
| X/2 | Picks, correct, accuracy and average probability |
| 2/2 | Picks, correct, accuracy and average probability |
| Other paths | Use separate rows where sample size is sufficient |
HT/FT Accuracy Will Naturally Differ from Standard 1X2 Accuracy
A standard 1X2 selection only needs one final result to be correct. An HT/FT prediction requires a specific combination across two checkpoints.
A match can therefore produce a correct Full Time Home forecast while the HT/FT selection remains wrong.
Historical percentages for these markets should not be compared as though they represent predictions of equal granularity.
Review the simpler final-result market at 1X2 Predictions Yesterday.
Half Time Accuracy Does Not Equal HT/FT Accuracy
Correctly forecasting the interval result solves only the first half of the HT/FT problem.
If the model predicts X/1 and the match is level at the break but finishes as a Draw, the Half Time component is correct while the full combination is not.
For interval-only historical performance, see Half Time Predictions Yesterday.
Confidence Gap Is Useful with Nine Possible Outcomes
Because the HT/FT distribution contains nine combinations, the leading probability may be relatively modest even when it is clearly ahead of the alternatives.
A simple Confidence Gap can compare the highest HT/FT probability with the second-highest.
| Top Outcome | Second Outcome | Confidence Gap |
|---|---|---|
| 1/1 – 43% | X/1 – 24% | 19 pts |
| X/1 – 29% | 1/1 – 27% | 2 pts |
The first example shows a clearer preferred path even though neither outcome exceeds 50%.
Probability Bands Should Be Adapted to HT/FT
Using the same confidence thresholds as a two-outcome or three-outcome market can misrepresent HT/FT because probability is distributed across nine alternatives.
Betiball can instead analyse empirical performance by probability band and choose labels only after enough historical observations exist.
The important question is whether outcomes assigned higher probabilities actually occur more frequently across the historical dataset.
Calibration Matters More Than Highlighting Successful Match Paths
A credible historical HT/FT record should include every eligible settled prediction, not only unusual or successful calls.
Across sufficiently large samples, an outcome carrying a higher forecast probability should occur more often than one assigned a lower probability.
Calibration can therefore test whether the percentages themselves contain useful information rather than simply counting correct top selections.
One Day Is Too Small to Judge the Model
Yesterday's results provide transparency but can contain a limited sample, especially when individual HT/FT pathways are analysed separately.
Betiball should therefore complement daily results with rolling historical views.
7-day performance
Useful for recent monitoring.
30-day performance
Provides a larger and more diverse sample.
90-day performance
Can provide stronger evidence of stability where the model methodology has remained comparable.
Competition-Level HT/FT Behaviour Can Differ
Different leagues can produce different first-half scoring rates, draw frequencies and second-half result changes.
First-half Draw rate
A competition with frequent level intervals can naturally create more X-based HT/FT pathways.
Lead retention
How often teams protect Half Time advantages can vary between competitions and team-strength profiles.
Comeback frequency
Complete reversals such as 1/2 and 2/1 may be rare enough that a substantial sample is needed before drawing conclusions.
Final Scores Should Not Rewrite the Original Match-Path Forecast
Once the match finishes, Betiball should add the result to the original prediction rather than recalculating the historical forecast using information that was not available beforehand.
Keep the original HT/FT selection
Incorrect predictions should remain visible.
Keep the original probability
The percentage should represent what the model estimated before kick-off.
Store prediction time
This identifies when the forecast was produced or last updated.
Add HT and FT scores separately
Actual scores belong to settlement data rather than the original forecast.
Prediction Revisions Should Be Preserved Where Possible
If the model recalculates HT/FT probabilities after confirmed team news but before kick-off, the historical dataset can retain those versions.
The final valid pre-match forecast can be used for headline settlement while earlier versions remain available for model auditing.
This prevents the historical record from appearing as though only one forecast ever existed when probabilities materially changed before the match.
First-Half Added Time Belongs to the HT Result
The Half Time checkpoint should use the score when the referee ends the first period rather than an arbitrary snapshot at exactly 45:00.
A valid goal scored during first-half additional time changes the interval score and therefore can change the first part of the HT/FT outcome.
The Full-Time Checkpoint Also Needs a Clearly Defined Match Period
Historical HT/FT settlement should make clear whether Full Time refers to the normal match period or another competition-specific definition.
This matters in knockout competitions where the teams can remain level after the normal period and later continue into extra time or penalties.
The defined period should be applied consistently to both predictions and historical results.
Extra Time Should Not Silently Change an HT/FT Result
If the prediction is defined using the ordinary regulation-time result, a team progressing after extra time or penalties should not retrospectively convert an X full-time result into a Home or Away win.
For example, a match that is 0-0 at Half Time and 1-1 at the end of the defined normal match period is X/X under that definition, even if one team later progresses.
Postponed and Abandoned Matches Require Separate Status
Only fixtures with valid results for both required checkpoints should enter the ordinary HT/FT accuracy calculation.
Postponed before kick-off
No match path exists to settle.
Abandoned in the first half
Neither a valid Half Time nor Full Time combination may exist.
Abandoned after Half Time
The interval result may be known while the Full Time stage remains unresolved.
Suspended match
The fixture should remain distinguished from a normally completed event while awaiting continuation or official determination.
Browse HT/FT Predictions Across Matchdays
Review Yesterday's Other Prediction Results
| Prediction Market | Historical Review |
|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home, Draw and Away full-time results |
| Live 1X2 | Historical in-play result probabilities |
| Under/Over 2.5 | Total-goal prediction results |
| Half Time | Interval-result predictions |
| BTTS | Both Teams to Score prediction results |
| Double Chance | 1X, X2 and 12 historical results |
| Asian Handicap | Historical handicap settlements |
| Goalscorers | Player scoring prediction results |
| Corners | Historical corner predictions |
| Cards | Historical disciplinary predictions |
How Yesterday's HT/FT Accuracy Should Be Reported
A transparent performance record should apply one consistent settlement method across dates and competitions.
Include every eligible settled prediction
Headline performance should not be calculated only from selected successful fixtures.
Preserve the original predicted path
The outcome shown before kick-off should remain visible after settlement.
Keep unsuccessful predictions
Incorrect HT/FT forecasts are an essential part of historical model evaluation.
Record the actual match path
The historical record should show both the interval and final result rather than a Correct or Incorrect badge alone.
Store the actual-result probability
This makes it possible to distinguish unexpected outcomes from alternatives that already carried substantial probability.
Show sample size
Every reported accuracy rate should be accompanied by the number of settled predictions used to calculate it.
Common Questions About Yesterday's HT/FT Predictions
What does Half Time/Full Time mean?
It combines the result at the interval with the result at Full Time.
What does 1/1 mean?
The home team leads at Half Time and wins the match.
What does X/1 mean?
The teams are level at Half Time and the home team wins at Full Time.
What does X/X mean?
The match is level at both Half Time and Full Time.
What does 2/1 mean?
The away team leads at Half Time before the home side comes back to win.
What does 1/2 mean?
The home team leads at Half Time before the away side completes a comeback and wins.
How many HT/FT combinations are there?
There are nine possible combinations formed from Home, Draw and Away results at the two checkpoints.
Can the Full Time prediction be correct while HT/FT is wrong?
Yes. Both parts of the HT/FT combination must match the actual result.
Can X/X finish 0-0 or 2-2?
Yes. X/X only requires the teams to be level at both checkpoints; the exact score can change.
Does a first-half stoppage-time goal count towards HT?
Yes. A valid goal scored before the referee ends the first period forms part of the Half Time score.
Can a high-probability HT/FT prediction still be wrong?
Yes. Probability represents estimated likelihood rather than certainty.
Where can I review today's HT/FT forecasts?
Official Match Periods Define the Two Result Checkpoints
The Half Time component should use the score when the opening period officially ends, including applicable added time. The Full Time component should follow the clearly defined match period used by Betiball for the prediction.
For the official framework, see IFAB Law 7 – The Duration of the Match and IFAB Law 10 – Determining the Outcome of a Match.
Historical HT/FT Results Do Not Guarantee Future Match Paths
Betiball provides statistical football analysis and probability estimates rather than guaranteed outcomes. Yesterday's results can help users examine model behaviour, match-path accuracy and calibration, but historical performance cannot determine the way future fixtures will develop.
Learn more about Betiball through About Us, FAQ, Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, Avoid Scam and Contact Us.
If you choose to gamble, only do so where legal and if you meet the applicable age requirements. Historical prediction accuracy should never be treated as a guarantee of future results. See Responsible Gaming for further information.
